A Letter To The Faculty
I received this email from another student informing me of the unanimous disturbing feeling towards the grading policies of our required courses. For the final exam, i studied 12 hours straight, paid attention in every class in the second half of the semester (it wasn’t a cumulative final) and still failed the exam. after writing an email to my professor pleading to round my soon to be 59.83 overall course grade up to at least a 60, i received a generic email from the professor essentially telling us “i didn’t fuck up, all of you fucked up, ill double check and make sure you fucked up, and if you’re fucked, go fuck yourself, peace i’m out”. words cannot express my complacency towards this institution.
Dear Members of the Babson Community,
I am writing to express my concern over this years IME 3 program, particularly the Managerial Accounting segment.
I wrote this email to Dean Reza on October 31st:
“My name is Snarl Henderson and I am a junior currently in IME 3 (A1). Throughout the semester I have grown increasingly more distraught and concerned regarding the grading policies and attitudes of the professors in my stream.
For the first time during my Babson tenure, grades have been treated as something linked to a mysterious college policy as opposed to actual performance. The professors in my stream continue to refer that they are forced to maintain a B- average in the course. For example, one of my professors stated that he was ‘given’ the option of enforcing a B or B- average and went with the latter. This ‘grade deflation’ strategy has led to no noticeable differentiation on grades within classes regardless of performance. To maintain this strict curve, professors are giving the vast majority of grades solely in the B range. An A has become rare and appears to be directly correlated to however many C’s or below are given.
While grade inflation may be a critical issue at top notch ivy institutions, Babson does not have the luxury of securing our futures through the weight of our brand. An emphasis on ‘grade deflation’ and a lack of grade dispersion will hinder the success of our graduates finding top positions at recruiting firms that also look at more prevalent schools that do not emphasize a grade deflation policy.
I do not know whether this is the policy of IME 3 faculty or the college. However, I would like to learn more about this issue and how it is currently in place and the way it is affecting my future success.”
Since this email the situation has only grown worse. While I do not speak for the entire junior class I am confident that the majority are expressing the same concerns particularly through dissatisfied comments on the course and professors evaluations. After the final exam, Professor Wain sent an argumentative email criticizing the ‘poor’ performance of the junior class. I quote “Some highlights: essays were pretty weak – overall grade average was 81.2 which I curved up to 82.”
While he did provide basis for his criticisms the fact remains that over 161 students are in his classes and if there were overwhelmingly unanimous faults, logic would presume that some fault lies with the faculty and test design. I had never realized how important achieving an exact 82 average was to our faculty. I was not aware that such an innovative school encouraged their faculty to place conformity and rigid academic grading policies above learning.
Another touchy issue in IME 3 was professionalism. In our Managerial Accounting courses, our professors supposedly gave every student a grade from 0-4 every class based on how many times students answered questions. If on average three questions per student yielded a four for that day and each question took an average of 30 seconds the ask and answer over 60 minutes of the class would be spent on Q & A.
Babson spends an enormous amount of resources trying to improve its curriculum; basic business practice would be to consult the actual customers (i.e. students).
I would like to add that this feeling of mistrust and overall confusion not only lies within me but with countless other members of the junior class. It is evident that there is an enforced curve on campus without the knowledge or consent of the student body. While grade inflation may be an issue at other schools, I have never seen or heard of any faculty member at Babson artificially inflating grades. This preemptive and aggressive strategy only leads to Babson graduates having difficulties competing versus top tier business schools. Babson does not have a sufficiently strong enough brand to allow their students to not concern themselves with their GPAs.
What does Babson gain from lowering the GPAs of its students?
Concerned Babson Student,
Snarl Henderson (name changed to protect the innocent)
This entry was posted on Sunday, December 11th, 2005 at 8:30 am and is filed under Babson, Crap. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
AIM to a friend or Set as Away
Post to Del.icio.us

Comments(6)

Hey.
Shut up and transfer, asshole.
tried it already oh-person of great insight and wisdom
Yeah, you know how many schools give credit for “FME”…
I e-mailed the professor too, he is such a arrogant prick… he thinks he is the man just cuz he wrote the stupid textbook, too bad he can’t teach for shit. Seriously, who spend 40 minutes on a single EASY homework problem the class before the final, and blames the class for sucking at the test which has nothing to do with what he taught.
Then he states that we can go over our grades when he comes back from vacation in January, a month after grades are closed… jackass.
I don’t even care about Babson grade deflation or w/e, but at least have professor who can teach and grade fairly, not make tests unfairly hard or take off points (in strategy) for the most innane things just to make the grading policy of a B- average.
i must say, i payed no attention in class, talked about studying for an hour, actually studied for about 20 minutes.
and i got a 102 on the final. so not sure what you’re all bitching about.
the class average for both exams was a 71. now since u were smart enough to get a 102 on the final, you’ll def be able to follow this. an average grade of 71 means that HALF of the students scored LESS than a 71, and HALF scored ABOVE a 71.
and if we think back to our prob and stats class, we should remember things called ‘outlyers’. these were data points that were, well shall we say, out of the ordinary. with an average of 71, and u scoring a102, its probably safe to assume your score was one of these mythical outlyers (not taking into account the standard deviation, call me a dumbass, but i dont think many people scored in the 100′s). with these facts, its safe to assume that your score was NOT reflective of the STRONG majority of the class. this being the case, the strong majority most certainly have something to “bitch about”.