I’d read it online if babsonfreepress.com wasn’t taken over by the evil Network Solutions…

obviously, babson’s response is in that old school, outdated, rat-on-your-friend-anonymously vein. it’s played out. i’m tired of seeing innocent kids get charged in an attempt to put pressure to rat out their peers. yes it works with the weak-minded and yes this costs money to clean but there has to be a better way to deal.

i think part of the problem is that nobody really knows why it’s done. were the people just drunk and in the mood to destroy? i’ve been there, made that mistake, it’s something you really can’t avoid that on a college campus. or were they rebelling against something, were they trying to make a statement? did babo bend them over? were they disappointed with babson in some specific way?

i don’t know whats more frusturating, the fact that babson thinks a charge can stop anything or the fact that i don’t understand why it’s done. if you’re gonna be a vandal at least find the balls to make a statement with your destruction.

that might be a lot to ask of these vandals, though. amateurs.

p.s. for those not on campus, babson’s most recent free press had the headline of ‘oclybetteredmycampuslife.com/babsonrules.’ a nice homage to this site as well as the progress that babson’s administration has made this year. thanks free press, props to dean hanno, sga and friends.

Deja vu! I remember that same advice last year when we were supposed to police the hallways and prevent the Map Hill elevator from being damaged…